Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Communism. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Communism. Afficher tous les articles

lundi 7 septembre 2009

Newsbusters' Makes Reckless Claim that Communism is Seeping into Our Schools After Listening to Story on Bruce DuMont's Radio Show

Newsbusters continues its right wing propaganda spin. This time they quoted bits of Bruce DuMont's radio show and tried to paint a picture that there was Communism seeping into our schools. Jeremy Rose, president of the Chicago Young Republicans told the story of how a teacher in a public school on the north side of Chicago told him that another teacher had all the students on the first day of school put all their school supplies in a pile on the floor and those supplies are divided among all the students, including those who have very little or none. He said that one student had a Dora the Explorer lunch box that was given to a child who didn't have one. The child went home and informed her father that her lunch box was taken away. The father then spoke with the teacher and expressed his concern over the issue. Newsbusters deliberately took that one story and turned it into one in which Communism is now seeping into our schools and a redistribution of wealth is occurring as a result.
Tonight I had chance to listen to Bruce DuMont's radio show and heard the story of how teachers in one school confiscate all the children's school supplies (and in this case even lunch boxes), put them in a pile, and everyone takes turns coming up and taking what they want, whether the parents like it or not. A guest on the show, Erika Brees, Heartland Regional Director for College Democrats of America, defended this action saying that "it's an important lesson that people learn to do with less so others can have what they need too, and if the parents aren't willing to teach that, I think it's good that the school does." [I paraphrase]

This is nothing more than an introduction to communism. I was shocked. I thought there's no way that this redistribution of personal property really goes on in American school rooms. After a few searches and several calls to teacher friends, I've found this to be more common than I ever would have thought, and of course there is not one media story on the subject to be found.

It's one thing to buy extra supplies so the classroom has the tools it needs to conduct class. It's quite another to steal property from one person... and give it to another. It's quickly becoming clear that America is under attack by communists. Communism is a disease that best grows in darkness and, in this country anyway, is destroyed by the light of mass attention. I ask all of you, if you find examples of communism in your classroom (particularly public schools), DM a tweet to me on Twitter or send me a direct message here at Newsbusters. Let me help get the word out.

And if your child's teacher confiscates the personal property you purchased for their education and distributes it to others against your will, I'd suggest you file a police report for theft. Source: Newsbusters.org
This reaction is almost laughable. It is a disgrace that Mithridate Ombud, who wrote the commentary on Newsbusters' website, could make such scurrilous accusations. At the start of every school year, my two sons have to donate paper towels, hand sanitizers, Zip-loc bags, etc., along with their classmates, which are used for the benefit of the entire class, including the wealthy children. They certainly do not have to give their lunch boxes to needy children. I am sure that was an isolated case and the student did not have to give the student her lunch box. Filing a police report for theft is an insult to all teachers across this country who have had to use their own money to purchase supplies for their classrooms. Why not address the disparities in schools in the inner cities and in the suburbs across this country?

These are the kind of reckless comments and deliberate smears that take root in the minds of the gullible people in our country. Sadly, the most important points of the radio show were missed, especially the argument that President Obama's speech is meant to encourage students to stay in school, stay off drugs, study hard and so on. It is equally surprising to note that Jeremy Rose did not even mention the high drop-out rates in the Chicago Public School system, as well as the high crime rates in these schools. Something drastic must be done to improve the education of all our children because we have 30% drop-out rate in schools in this country. That's a damning statistic that should not be dogging a superpower such as the USA.

dimanche 4 janvier 2009

Antigua-Barduda Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer Comes Under Fire for Accepting a Donation from Hugo Chavez Regime


Are the islands of Antigua-Barbuda in bed with Venezuelan nutjob Hugo Chavez? Well, it seems like the opposition Antigua Labour Party said it is distressed at what it called the government’s hoodwinking of the disabled community in Antigua and Barbuda and accepting funds from Venezuela. The ALP said that the Baldwin Spencer regime is basing a program to help disabled residents on a hand-out from the Chavez government.
The ALP also drew attention to a statement from Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer that help to the disabled in a fulfillment of his party's promise at the last general election. The ALP asked, "Does this mean that if Spencer had not received this money from Venezuela, he would not have fulfilled his promise?"

ALP political leader, Lester Bird, said, "This program, like all the other programs the UPP regime is now hustling to do, is another election gimmick that will not be sustained. It is a desperate attempt by a desperate political party to buy votes with money donated to the government." Source: Caribbean Net News
I did some research and discovered that the Government Treasury collected $1 billion in taxes, so why couldn't funds from that be used to fund the program? It seems that Hugo Chavez is trying to get his tentacles stuck in some of the Caribbean islands and that is a shame. I would think that the last thing a prime minister or president want is to be portrayed as a buddy of Hugo Chavez. At least in America's eyes. As someone from the Caribbean, I remember when I was a child that former Prime Minister Michael Manley had developed a relationship with Cuba's Fidel Castro and it made a lot of Jamaican very uncomfortable because of what Castro stood for and the mistrust of the communist ideology.

Antigua-Barduda Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer Comes Under Fire for Accepting a Donation from Hugo Chavez Regime


Are the islands of Antigua-Barbuda in bed with Venezuelan nutjob Hugo Chavez? Well, it seems like the opposition Antigua Labour Party said it is distressed at what it called the government’s hoodwinking of the disabled community in Antigua and Barbuda and accepting funds from Venezuela. The ALP said that the Baldwin Spencer regime is basing a program to help disabled residents on a hand-out from the Chavez government.
The ALP also drew attention to a statement from Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer that help to the disabled in a fulfillment of his party's promise at the last general election. The ALP asked, "Does this mean that if Spencer had not received this money from Venezuela, he would not have fulfilled his promise?"

ALP political leader, Lester Bird, said, "This program, like all the other programs the UPP regime is now hustling to do, is another election gimmick that will not be sustained. It is a desperate attempt by a desperate political party to buy votes with money donated to the government." Source: Caribbean Net News
I did some research and discovered that the Government Treasury collected $1 billion in taxes, so why couldn't funds from that be used to fund the program? It seems that Hugo Chavez is trying to get his tentacles stuck in some of the Caribbean islands and that is a shame. I would think that the last thing a prime minister or president want is to be portrayed as a buddy of Hugo Chavez. At least in America's eyes. As someone from the Caribbean, I remember when I was a child that former Prime Minister Michael Manley had developed a relationship with Cuba's Fidel Castro and it made a lot of Jamaican very uncomfortable because of what Castro stood for and the mistrust of the communist ideology.

jeudi 1 janvier 2009

Connecticut Lawmaker Frank Nicastro's Proposal for Government Bailout of Local Newspapers Smacks of Socialism


The notion that the government should bail out just about every industry in the United States is unconscionable. I have yet to hear one bailout plan to help struggling homeowners and to stem the massive tide of unemployment slowly permeating this country. I was disgusted to learn that Connecticut lawmaker Frank Nicastro sees saving the local newspaper his responsibility. This will set a very worrisome precedent for the government to get involved with the press. Socialism comes to mind. Heck, even the dreaded communism comes to mind.

Nicastro represents Connecticut's 79th assembly district, which includes the city of Bristol. Its paper, The Bristol Press, reportedly may collapse within days, along with The Herald newspaper in New Britain. It seems that the parent company, Journal Register, is in serious jeopardy of folding due to millions of dollars debt and it says it just cannot afford to keep these papers open. So, enter Nicastro on his stallion, along with fellow lawmakers who want to the papers to survive and have petitioned the state government to step in. "The media is a vitally important part of America," he said, particularly local papers that cover news ignored by big papers and television and radio stations. Wait, doesn't this sound like a bailout?

This comes on the heels of the government's decision to literally throw billions away to the banks and to General Motors Corporation and Chrysler LLC. The broader issue with this latest proposal is that relying on government help raises significant ethical questions for the press, whose traditional role has been to operate free from government influence as it goes after politicians to hold them accountable to the people who elected them. You cannot have it both ways. It would definitely muddy the mission of the press in the grand scheme of things.
The lifeline comes as U.S. newspaper publishers such as the New York Times, Tribune and McClatchy deal with falling advertising revenue, fleeing readers and tremendous debt. Aggravating this extreme change is the world financial crisis. Publishers have slashed costs, often by firing thousands in a bid to remain healthy and to impress investors. Any aid to papers could gladden financial stakeholders, said Mike Simonton, an analyst at Fitch Ratings."If governments are able to provide enough incentives to get some potential bidders off the sidelines, that could be a positive for newspaper valuations," he said.

Many media experts predict that 2009 will be the year that newspapers of all sizes will falter and die, a threat long predicted but rarely taken seriously until the credit crunch blossomed into a full-fledged financial meltdown.Some papers no longer print daily, and some not at all. Even as industries deemed too important to fail are seeking bailouts, most newspaper publishers have refused to give serious thought to the idea, though some industry insiders recounted joking about it with other newspaper executives."The whole idea of the First Amendment and separating media and giving them freedom of control from the government is sacrosanct," said Digby Solomon, publisher of Tribune Co's Daily Press in Newport News, Virginia. Source: Reuters
The government does not have an obligation to preserve free press by bailing them out. Many have accused Barack Obama of being a socialist, but this proposal reeks of socialism at it worst. Sorry, taxpayer dollars are not to be thrown out to everyone with a cup. There are other incentives that can be offered to help these newspapers, but not for the government to offer a bailout. What about the taxpayers who are literally under water in their homes. I must say that 2009 will be a rather interesting year.

The residents of Bristol and surrounding areas should call Frank Nicastro's office and voice their disapproval for his proposal. His contact information is:

At the Capitol:
Legislative Office Building, Room 4061
Hartford, CT 06106-1591
(860) 240-8585
1-800-842-8267
Frank.Nicastro@cga.ct.gov

In the District:
80 Beleden Gardens Drive
Bristol, CT 06708
(860) 585-6070

Connecticut Lawmaker Frank Nicastro's Proposal for Government Bailout of Local Newspapers Smacks of Socialism


The notion that the government should bail out just about every industry in the United States is unconscionable. I have yet to hear one bailout plan to help struggling homeowners and to stem the massive tide of unemployment slowly permeating this country. I was disgusted to learn that Connecticut lawmaker Frank Nicastro sees saving the local newspaper his responsibility. This will set a very worrisome precedent for the government to get involved with the press. Socialism comes to mind. Heck, even the dreaded communism comes to mind.

Nicastro represents Connecticut's 79th assembly district, which includes the city of Bristol. Its paper, The Bristol Press, reportedly may collapse within days, along with The Herald newspaper in New Britain. It seems that the parent company, Journal Register, is in serious jeopardy of folding due to millions of dollars debt and it says it just cannot afford to keep these papers open. So, enter Nicastro on his stallion, along with fellow lawmakers who want to the papers to survive and have petitioned the state government to step in. "The media is a vitally important part of America," he said, particularly local papers that cover news ignored by big papers and television and radio stations. Wait, doesn't this sound like a bailout?

This comes on the heels of the government's decision to literally throw billions away to the banks and to General Motors Corporation and Chrysler LLC. The broader issue with this latest proposal is that relying on government help raises significant ethical questions for the press, whose traditional role has been to operate free from government influence as it goes after politicians to hold them accountable to the people who elected them. You cannot have it both ways. It would definitely muddy the mission of the press in the grand scheme of things.
The lifeline comes as U.S. newspaper publishers such as the New York Times, Tribune and McClatchy deal with falling advertising revenue, fleeing readers and tremendous debt. Aggravating this extreme change is the world financial crisis. Publishers have slashed costs, often by firing thousands in a bid to remain healthy and to impress investors. Any aid to papers could gladden financial stakeholders, said Mike Simonton, an analyst at Fitch Ratings."If governments are able to provide enough incentives to get some potential bidders off the sidelines, that could be a positive for newspaper valuations," he said.

Many media experts predict that 2009 will be the year that newspapers of all sizes will falter and die, a threat long predicted but rarely taken seriously until the credit crunch blossomed into a full-fledged financial meltdown.Some papers no longer print daily, and some not at all. Even as industries deemed too important to fail are seeking bailouts, most newspaper publishers have refused to give serious thought to the idea, though some industry insiders recounted joking about it with other newspaper executives."The whole idea of the First Amendment and separating media and giving them freedom of control from the government is sacrosanct," said Digby Solomon, publisher of Tribune Co's Daily Press in Newport News, Virginia. Source: Reuters
The government does not have an obligation to preserve free press by bailing them out. Many have accused Barack Obama of being a socialist, but this proposal reeks of socialism at it worst. Sorry, taxpayer dollars are not to be thrown out to everyone with a cup. There are other incentives that can be offered to help these newspapers, but not for the government to offer a bailout. What about the taxpayers who are literally under water in their homes. I must say that 2009 will be a rather interesting year.

The residents of Bristol and surrounding areas should call Frank Nicastro's office and voice their disapproval for his proposal. His contact information is:

At the Capitol:
Legislative Office Building, Room 4061
Hartford, CT 06106-1591
(860) 240-8585
1-800-842-8267
Frank.Nicastro@cga.ct.gov

In the District:
80 Beleden Gardens Drive
Bristol, CT 06708
(860) 585-6070