I wondered what Caroline Kennedy's views are on the hot button issues facing America and I read a New York Times article that cleared the air for me. She is, as I expected, middle on the road on most issues and still cautious on others. Here's the NY Times article in its entirety:
NICHOLAS CONFESSORE Published: December 20, 2008
ALBANY — In just a few days, Caroline Kennedy’s bid to replace Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has acquired nearly all the trappings of a traditional New York statewide campaign: a bevy of consultants, a tour of upstate cities and television cameras tracking her every move.
Now Ms. Kennedy has added something else to the list: a platform — of sorts.
On Saturday, Ms. Kennedy’s spokesman provided written answers to 15 questions posed by The New York Times. Most of the answers were brief, and some did not fully address the questions. Taken together, they cover a small part of the broad array of issues, from the parochial to the profound, that any New York senator is expected to confront.
But as Ms. Kennedy continues her effort to convince Gov. David A. Paterson that she deserves the seat being vacated by Mrs. Clinton, the answers — drafted by Ms. Kennedy and her staff — provide a glimpse of her political ideology.
In most respects, Ms. Kennedy’s answers portray her as being in line with New York Democrats’ views similar to those of New York’s senior senator, Charles E. Schumer, and Mrs. Clinton.
On social issues, Ms. Kennedy opposes restrictions on abortion rights, including laws that would require young women to notify a parent before obtaining an abortion. She described herself as a “strong supporter” of gun control, a stance that will likely find much more favor in New York City and its suburbs than upstate. Unlike Mrs. Clinton, however, Ms. Kennedy seems to support same-sex marriage.
“Caroline supports full equality and marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples,” the statement said.
She also appears to share mainstream Democratic views on most labor issues. Ms. Kennedy supports federal legislation, known as the “card check” bill, that would make it easier for unions to organize, the highest priority for the labor movement. She expressed some concern about what she described as “unintended, negative consequences” of the North American Free Trade Agreement, though stopped short of saying that it should be modified.
Ms. Kennedy also said she supported the auto industry bailout bill passed by the House and widely supported in parts of upstate New York that are home to auto-parts manufacturers.
But other answers may prove more controversial. Ms. Kennedy declined to say whether she supports placing a cap on local property taxes in New York, a hot-button issue that has sharply divided Democrats and Republicans in Albany. And Ms. Kennedy, who lives on Park Avenue, also declined to say whether she supports raising state or federal income taxes for the rich to help balance the budget and pay for government programs.
Ms. Kennedy, whose Senate bid has been aggressively championed in recent days by Joel I. Klein, the city’s schools chancellor, also supports Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s bid to retain mayoral control of schools.
In response to a question about whether she would favor modifying the school-governance law—which must be renewed by state lawmakers in the coming months — Ms. Kennedy’s statement said: “She is always open to new ideas on how to make the law better so long as they don’t prevent the mayor from taking the actions he thinks are appropriate and for which he will be held accountable.”
On illegal immigration, Ms. Kennedy hews closely to the path promoted by her uncle, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, backing a so-called path to citizenship for the undocumented.
“Caroline believes all undocumented workers should be required to legalize their presence in the United States and that we must create a way for them to do so,” according to her statement. “Undocumented workers should pay a fine, learn English and go to the back of the line behind those who came here legally.”
Ms. Kennedy also answered written questions from other publications, including Politico.com. It reported on Saturday that Ms. Kennedy opposed the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq and “supports President-elect Obama’s plan to work with our military leaders to begin a responsible withdrawal.”
But Ms. Kennedy, who is close to Mr. Bloomberg, a registered Independent, declined to answer a question about whether she would support a Democratic candidate for mayor during the 2009 elections.
She also would not say whether she supported Mr. Bloomberg’s controversial but successful efforts to alter New York’s term-limits law to allow him to run for a third term.
While Ms. Kennedy’s stance on various of issues would undoubtedly be of interest to many New Yorkers, particularly since she has remained out of the spotlight for so many years, the only vote that she must win for now is Mr. Paterson’s.
I still think Carolyn Kennedy is very uncomfortable in the public arena and I am very reluctant to say that she is qualified for such an office. I will give her credit for her years of tireless service to education. I did not think that Hillary Clinton was as qualified as she tried to lead us to believe when she first ran for the Senate, but she had that tenacity and determination to prove that she would be a great senator. I don't see that burning ambition in Carolyn Kennedy. Andrew Cuomo is my choice, but alas, the final word will come from Governor Patterson.
As the investigation into the Madoff scheme deepens, other prominent names are coming to the forefront. I say that it's time for all these fat cats to pay for what they've done.
